Health Boards
Fri-15-07-2016, 22:08 PM
"Fred.
EDIT: I've just read your other PM. And yes I do publish studies and news articles from reliable sources and I work very hard to make sure it is indeed reliable information. It's important to me to make sure that our readers are getting the correct information and a lot of work goes in to making sure it is reliable. That doesn't mean no other information is not valid, but we do protect our members and readers from false information and that is why we don't allow members to promote other websites.
Should you feel there is news or studies that we may have missed about the treatment of psoriasis then by all means run it past me and I will get our team to look into it."
Just so there is no misunderstanding. My confusion came from you posting studies from such govermental websites. I have no inkling to disobey the rules you set forth here. I just naturally assumed, if you could reference material from the same site that I referred to, it would be ok.
But now that you have made it quite clear, any studies or information posted elsewhere, even if they are peer reviewed, needs to meet with your approval. I will refrain from mentioning any websites, including the aforementioned governmental site I referenced to, where all the scientific studies are cataloged. As much as they would be relevant to my discussion, I have no need to disobey the rules you set forth. It was clearly, an understandable misunderstanding.
Should I feel the need to bring to your attention outside information or relevant studies that might be helpful to others here, I most likely would be hesitant in doing such, but thanks anyway.
EDIT: I've just read your other PM. And yes I do publish studies and news articles from reliable sources and I work very hard to make sure it is indeed reliable information. It's important to me to make sure that our readers are getting the correct information and a lot of work goes in to making sure it is reliable. That doesn't mean no other information is not valid, but we do protect our members and readers from false information and that is why we don't allow members to promote other websites.
Should you feel there is news or studies that we may have missed about the treatment of psoriasis then by all means run it past me and I will get our team to look into it."
Just so there is no misunderstanding. My confusion came from you posting studies from such govermental websites. I have no inkling to disobey the rules you set forth here. I just naturally assumed, if you could reference material from the same site that I referred to, it would be ok.
But now that you have made it quite clear, any studies or information posted elsewhere, even if they are peer reviewed, needs to meet with your approval. I will refrain from mentioning any websites, including the aforementioned governmental site I referenced to, where all the scientific studies are cataloged. As much as they would be relevant to my discussion, I have no need to disobey the rules you set forth. It was clearly, an understandable misunderstanding.
Should I feel the need to bring to your attention outside information or relevant studies that might be helpful to others here, I most likely would be hesitant in doing such, but thanks anyway.
